OLPC XO and the Magic Sunshine ScreenApril 18, 2008
higher resolution than 95% of the laptop displays on the market today [i.e., 200dpi color, which is theoretically higher than that on the iPhone — gm]; approximately 1/7th the power consumption; 1/3rd the price; sunlight readability; and room-light readability with the backlight off
Whatever other difficulties the OLPC organization may be , the display is seemingly a singular achievement that could result in better handhelds, ebook readers and laptops at significantly lower cost.
But how good is the display, really?
In my earlier at the XO, I was quite surprised by the display’s high quality, given the low cost of the machine. With the backlight turned on and the screen displaying full color, I found it to be fairly crisp and bright, far better than the murky displays I’ve seen on some low-end laptops.
In bright daylight where ordinary laptop screens are often barely usable, if at all, the XO performed brilliantly. I loaded a pdf of my current read, , to test the XO display’s mettle with the backlight turned off in reflective monochrome mode. A MacBook Pro in the same environment had me running for shade, since the display was barely legible. The XO text display, on the other hand, was highly readable with good contrast. It was completely suitable for reading in bright daylight (see photo at the top of this post). While the satiny surface of the screen could cause some glare issues (below), slight shifts in position were enough to alleviate the problem.
All in all, the XO display quality and daylight performance were delivered as promised. Since the technology behind the display is beyond OLPC, we can perhaps look forward to a new generation of capable and lower-cost machines with the XO in their lineage.